Comment title
Canada’s Deep Geological Repository Debate: Institutional and Procedural Insights from 2015–2017
Submitted by
Erika Simpson
Comment text

 

Attached: New Paper on Canada’s Deep Geological Repository Debate
Title: Canada’s Deep Geological Repository Debate: Institutional and Procedural Insights from 2015–2017
Author: Dr. Erika Simpson

This paper offers a detailed examination of the institutional and procedural dynamics shaping Canada’s debate over a Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for spent nuclear fuel. Drawing on evidence from 2015–2017, it emphasizes key lessons and asks compelling questions about public engagement, decision-making processes, and ongoing governance challenges.

Dr. Erika Simpson is an Associate Professor of International Politics in the Department of Political Science at Western University. She is available for questions or commentary.

Contact:
Social Science Centre (SSC), London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C2
<Contact Information Removed>

Date submitted
2026-01-19 - 6:59 PM
Public notice
Public Notice - Comments invited on the summary of the Initial Project Description and funding available
Phase
Planning
Attachment(s)
  • Canada’s Deep Geological Repository Debate_Institutional and Procedural Insights from 2015–2017_Redacted.pdf (193.7 KB)
  • Comment tags
    Indigenous Consultation Method Climate change Accidental Events / Malfunctions Seismic / Volcanic Activity Weather Events / Flooding / Hazards Fish and Fish Habitat Species at Risk Wildlife / Habitat Geology / Geomorphology Groundwater Quality General opposition to project Fishing Recreation Tourism Human Health and Well-Being Assessment Timelines / Process Need for the Project Project Alternatives Purpose of the Project General support of project Community / Regional Services Employment Opportunities Radioactivity Current Use of Lands and Resources for Traditional Purposes by Indigenous Peoples Indigenous Rights Spiritual, Physical and Cultural Heritage
    Date updated
    2026-01-23 - 12:40 PM
    Rationale for update
    Comment updated at the author's request
    Reference number
    75
    Date modified: